INTERESTED IN LEARNING ABOUT COMMODITIES.
CLICK HERE FOR YOUR INTRODUCTORY PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THIS 45-MINUTE VIDEOTAPE!

HOME PAGE
HISTORY
LEARN MORE
PERFORMANCE
SAMPLE BULLETIN
SUBSCRIBE NOW
PORTFOLIO.PLUS
Special Report
CONTRACT SPECS
LINKS
BOOKSHELF
CONTACT US

The Markets, Trading Systems, Dad and Other Adventures
SFO Feature Interview with Philip Gotthelf, Publisher, COMMODEX System
by: Russell Wasendorf, Sr.

Read More >>


Commodex® Trial 
5 Issues. only $9.95

Click Here For Your Live Trial And Literature Package


CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE


PO BOX 566
CLOSTER, NJ 07624-0566
(800) 336-1818
(201) 784-1235

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT WRITTEN September 26, 2001


SPECIAL REPORT

FROM THE DESK OF PHILIP GOTTHELF


Oil Takes The Dive

 After being stopped out of the short side of crude twice, the market finally crashed as I had anticipated.  Once again, volatility proves that even when you’re right, your trading can fail to yield a profit.  The significance of oil’s plunge is far reaching when considering how intricately this commodity is tied into the Middle East and our own economic health.  Cheaper energy was the catalyst we were seeking to stimulate the economy before the demise of the World Trade Center.  Regardless of Federal Reserve rhetoric about the diminished role of energy prices in our gross domestic product (GDP), there was absolutely no doubt that back-to-back years of excruciating energy bills took a toll on the American and European public.  Let’s face it…  we just went through a serious energy crisis that brought California to its fiscal knees and threatened other major population centers. 

An entire segment of the Bush/Gore debate centered on developing an energy policy and creating “energy independence.”  This brings up a very interesting theory about the timing of recent terrorism.  Stories about terrorist motives have appeared on virtually every news station and throughout newspapers since the horrific incident of Tuesday, September 11th.  What becomes clear is the confusion over motives.  Regardless of apparent anti-American sentiment, the Middle East has a powerful symbiotic relationship with the West.  America, Europe, and Japan are the economic lifeblood of OPEC.  The Saudi Prince, while deeply religious, drives a Rolls Royce and a Ferrari.  He boasts one of the largest private yachts in the world.  Most of the Royal Saudi family wealth is invested in Western companies, government bonds, and real estate.  Thus, Bin Laden is a contradiction to the entire lifestyle of modern Islam.

However, there has been mounting tension between OPEC and the industrialized West because each side has an apparent strangle hold on the other.  We need OPEC oil…  for now.  OPEC needs our money.  However, the latest squeeze OPEC inflicted was met with significant hostility.  Effectively, OPEC went too far.  As if they had their own death wish, OPEC contributed to the decline in Western economies and helped destroy their own wealth as U.S., Japanese, and European stock markets faltered.  By some private estimates, OPEC lost more money in deteriorating investment value than they achieved by raising oil prices.  They helped to create an energy crisis that clearly backfired. 

In addition, OPEC became “politically incorrect.”  This is to say that there was a strong U.S. backlash that reverberated in Washington.  America was about to take serious action.  This threat of energy independence can be viewed as retaliation…  it is a form of war.  Just we were developing anti-OPEC sentiment in the United States, it is not hard to reverse perspectives to see how Middle East oil producers were evolving growing anti-West sentiment.  This gave radical Islamic Fundamentalists a brief foothold.  Terrorist sympathizers were content to keep the illusion of conflict simmering with the Arab – Israeli discord.  In their wildest dreams, they never imagined an all-out attack on the United States of the magnitude we have seen.  Now, everyone is in trouble. 

Unquestionably, the United States and its allies have the capability of reshaping the map.  All the nonsense about how difficult it will be to fight a war in Afghanistan is simply war machine public relations.  Operation Desert Storm is not the objective.  We need a prolonged action to reestablish the U.S. military industrial complex.  The reality is that we have the weapons and skill to annihilate Afghanistan and any other hostile nation.  But, such a “quick solution” is not acceptable at this time for economic and political reasons.  However, any further terrorist attacks could be the catalysts for unimaginable retaliation.  Indeed, a new global war is not far from reality. 

OPEC is keenly aware of this possibility.  As I mentioned, they have the impetus to pump like crazy to support the West in its quest to regain economic stability and reestablish the money flow to OPEC producers.  Moderate OPEC nations cannot afford a Holy War.  Most assuredly, the West would usurp Iraq, Iran, and a host of other oil-rich countries if a war escalates.  Once in control of “swing production,”  the West would exercise substantial control over world oil production and pricing.  This event would probably turn the rest of OPEC against the West in one final conflict.  Under such circumstances, Islam would be torn between fundamentalism, politics, and survival.  Non-OPEC nations like Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon would face serious alliance issues.  With whom do they side?  Any rational government is not going to declare war against NATO. 

For speculators, the immediate opportunity is in the short side of energy.  OPEC intends to please the West with lower prices.  Obviously, the first bombs to drop will jerk oil up and down, but I believe the general direction is down.  Further, the supply side is not the only driving force.  A huge drop in jet fuel demand coupled with a near stoppage in U.S. travel has literally halted product demand.  In a near instant, natural gas has plunged from $10 to $2.  

December crude oil above demonstrates how prices can literally “fall off the map.”   Yet, we should keep in mind that crude oil had more impressive declines in 1985 and 1990 as the following monthly chart indicates.  From a high of approximately $30 in October, 1985 prices nose dived to $9.75 by April.  Immediately following Dessert Storm, process plummeted from $40 to $17.50.

 

The speed of these “corrections” is truly remarkable.  Circumstances are very similar to our current situation.  However, the next several weeks will carry more uncertainty.  Understand that the 1985 decline was due to a disagreement between OPEC members about quotas.  That was a supply-driven event.  Obviously, 1990 was a conflict-driven phenomenon. The speed of the military intervention was unprecedented as was the swift return of Kuwait’s oil to the market. 

We should be aware that the World Trade Center destruction took down the entire U.S. psychology.  People are not flying…  not driving…  not buying.  The shock will take months to overcome.  I would not be surprised to see a dramatic shift in energy consumption that adds to the current weakness.  A recession would impact transportation to the point where crude could, once again, penetrate below $10. 

Precious Metals 

There has been considerable talk about the pros and cons of gold and silver.  I turned bullish on gold based upon the “fear factor.”  The current environment draws a very fine line between a bullish or bearish scenario.  If commodity prices are due to implode from the new “recession,” then there is no reason why gold should offer upside potential.  On the other hand, massive monetary expansion can decrease confidence in paper assets.  If all else fails, move into gold.  With prices remaining a hint under $300 an ounce, the downside is viewed as limited.  After all, gold is not likely to become totally worthless.  The question is, “How low can gold go?”  The daily chart suggests $265 as an approximate floor.  We have to go back to January, 1979 to find prices as depressed as we have seen over the past two years. 

It is difficult to buy gold in the face of collapsing oil… among other raw commodities.  Yet, until the war on terrorism takes a more definitive track, uncertainty is likely to support the yellow metal. 

Silver also represents a flight to quality.  While I have been more skeptical about silver’s potential than gold’s, I cannot overlook silver’s role as the “poor man’s gold.”  Silver is more affordable.  Despite continuing strides in digital imaging, silver could experience an extraordinary demand surge as tension and uncertainty mounts.  In some ways, silver’s chart is more attractive with a more defined “pennant.” The “pole” is crystal clear.  Although the flag is shallow, it is apparent.  A breakout above 46500 penetrates the upside and sets the stage for a rally as high as $5! 

 Debt Markets Fear Oil’s Decline 

As earlier alluded to in this REPORT, oil producers are bound for declining revenues as prices slide.  Countries like Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria, and Mexico rely upon oil as a major component of foreign revenue and a means to finance through debt. 

Already, newswires carry stories about questionable debt repayments and possible defaults.  Russia’s Energy Minister, Igor Yusufov, has indicated that Russia is not concerned and he views the price decline as temporary.  Russia was invited into OPEC, but chose to be an “observer.”  This allows Russia to coordinate with OPEC without being bound by quotas and rules. 

In truth, the world has been building overcapacity.  Saudi Arabia has more than doubled pumping capacity over the last four years as have other OPEC countries.  Russia has been rapidly developing new fields while using Western funding to revitalize old wells.  My sources tell me Russia is ready, willing, and able to participate in a price war with an average cost-per-barrel under $5.  Russia controls the largest oil reserves on the planet.  In reality, OPEC represents a competitor rather than an ally.  Surely, Russian bonds have a high degree of risk.  While I don’t recommend them, I am not as skeptical about their potential. 

Meanwhile, traders have finally picked up on U.S. long bonds as a “quality issue.”  I believe the yield curve is too aggressively skewed toward the long end.  The 30-year and 10-year rates should decline to flatten the curve.  We have indication the FED will continue easing the short end.  At some stage, I think investors are going to consider bonds fairly cheap.  After all, a nominal positive return is better than negative stock market performance!

Here, again, I attempted to buy during a “bull market correction.”  Recall my chart comments when I recommended the buy last week:  “December Bonds display a substantially bearish picture.  By any technical standard, they are a sell.  However, the stock market close suggests bonds may be the only place to flee besides gold.  The word is that investors fear Bonds will lose parity against the Euro and lose foreign participation.  We are going contrary to the chart… for now.  Heaven help us!” 

Well, so far heaven has been on our side.  This demonstrates that chart analysis is an art more than a science.  Sometimes, fundamentals play the pivotal role in being right….  Sometimes!  

With the S & P 500 looking like the chart above, who wouldn’t want a little “quality” in their portfolio?u 

Email:  phil@commodex.com

 

Archive Index

Renowned Analyst, Philip Gotthelf Shows You How To Invest For Huge Profit Potentials.  Learn Secrets To Trading The Fastest Markets In The World!


MEET THE PUBLISHER


As Seen On NBC Nightly News, CNBC, FNN, FOX News, CBS, Nightly Business Report, The TODAY Show, CNN And Other Broadcast Media.

This Week's
HOT STORY!
Last Updated
June 12th, 2003


ATTENTION!

STOCK INVESTMENT SECRET
REVEALED BY MICHIGAN MAN…
Click Here To Find Out More!